ممكن بس حدا يفسر لي ليش حتى الصفحة الأولى لجريدة الأخبار اللبنانية انضمت لجحافل "الرديحة" و"السميمة"؟ إنو شو فينا نعمل لنقرا الأخبار بدون تمليح و تبهير و خلطة الخواجة الصحافي الخاصة للتواصل الإعلامي.
إنو شو ممكن إفهم أنا من مانشيت متل "نصر الله: الثأر من أسياد القتلة" و سطرأول بيقول: " أجهز الأمين العام لحزب الله السيد حسن نصر الله على مشروع الفتنة من جانب المعارضة. "
إنو وين الخبر؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ ومين اللي عم يحقن العالم ويعمل فتنة.
كل عمرا جريدة الأخبار مفذلكة و بدك تحط اللاروس والمعجم و إستاذ خصوصي لحتى تقدر تستوعب كتابات جوزيف سماحة. وشي مبصر على محلل رموز على شاكلة رأفت الهجان لتفهم شو بدو يقول زياد الرحباني. بس عل القليلة كان في صفحة أولى بتخبرك شو صار بأقل قدر من اللؤم و السم ومن دون ما يحيدو عن توجههم السياسي المعروف.
شو صار؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
طب شو بيعمل الإنسان الحساس اللي متلي (قال إنو يعني تونغ إن زا تشيك) اللي بيبطل يستوعب لما تتقل دوز السم واللئمني. ما شي يا خي بيتلت راسي ببطل إفهم شو عم يقولو! طب ما أنا أولريدي, ديجا يعني , وقفت إقرا و إتفرج عل المستقبل, أل بي سس, نيو تي في, والمنار. ما يا لطيف ألطف صار في نوع مبتكر من الجهاد اللي ألله نسي يفرضو والنبي نسي يضمو لأركان الإسلام وهو الجهاد الإعلامي اللي الحمد الله ما مخلى حدا من شرو!!!
ألله يخلليلنا الشوتايم يا رب و يطول بعمر الدجادج جودي (مش دجاج فراخ يعني, لأ يا زكي دجادج يعني قاضي! أف ولو!!!)
إنو شو ممكن إفهم أنا من مانشيت متل "نصر الله: الثأر من أسياد القتلة" و سطرأول بيقول: " أجهز الأمين العام لحزب الله السيد حسن نصر الله على مشروع الفتنة من جانب المعارضة. "
إنو وين الخبر؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ ومين اللي عم يحقن العالم ويعمل فتنة.
كل عمرا جريدة الأخبار مفذلكة و بدك تحط اللاروس والمعجم و إستاذ خصوصي لحتى تقدر تستوعب كتابات جوزيف سماحة. وشي مبصر على محلل رموز على شاكلة رأفت الهجان لتفهم شو بدو يقول زياد الرحباني. بس عل القليلة كان في صفحة أولى بتخبرك شو صار بأقل قدر من اللؤم و السم ومن دون ما يحيدو عن توجههم السياسي المعروف.
شو صار؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
طب شو بيعمل الإنسان الحساس اللي متلي (قال إنو يعني تونغ إن زا تشيك) اللي بيبطل يستوعب لما تتقل دوز السم واللئمني. ما شي يا خي بيتلت راسي ببطل إفهم شو عم يقولو! طب ما أنا أولريدي, ديجا يعني , وقفت إقرا و إتفرج عل المستقبل, أل بي سس, نيو تي في, والمنار. ما يا لطيف ألطف صار في نوع مبتكر من الجهاد اللي ألله نسي يفرضو والنبي نسي يضمو لأركان الإسلام وهو الجهاد الإعلامي اللي الحمد الله ما مخلى حدا من شرو!!!
ألله يخلليلنا الشوتايم يا رب و يطول بعمر الدجادج جودي (مش دجاج فراخ يعني, لأ يا زكي دجادج يعني قاضي! أف ولو!!!)
100% on this one... i refuse to read these propaganda machines including akhbar, diyar, moustaqbal, l'orient.
ReplyDeleteI know Maya, but the problem is I can't find a source of information, let go trustworthy, i'm just asking for a source of information! honestly i do not understand what i read anymore...
ReplyDelete- Nasrallah was referring to Americans. a thing that is no different than "death to America" slogan repeated by HA since the early 80s.
ReplyDelete- I disagree with maya about this. In order to get all the in order to get all the info we gotta read them all. I for instance Love to read almustaqbal (can u believe that? :P ) It tells me how FM thinks and what are their future steps. Yes i laugh alot when I read it bas shi w menno :P
now about akhbar,
there are bad things and good thing. for example, ibrahim el ameen is known for his wide relations with intelligence forces (mokhabarat) and he has bad relations with jonblat. I keep that in mind, but I read him cause i can get some info that I don't know.
i disagree with u about joseph smei7a ya achinar. la2 wlo manno kill hal 2add so3ob. I think u r referring to today's article. yeh it contains alot of international and historical view that may seem difficult bas usually I enjoy reading him.
khaled saghiyyh is anti future bas he is humorous and he doesn't claim to bemore than that.
niqola naseef is the least to show his political opinion. he is worth reading. The god things about akhbar is the way they follow the event.
Also, for me, i love reading the cultural file the usually do on a certain topic.
ziad rahbany.. well. I guess we have to read today's article after like a couple of months to understand him. lately he wrote a series of articles about jomhooriyya B-zero. they seemed surrealistic. well after what happened on Thursday, they turned out to be not surrealistic at all. And about rahbany also, many claim that he is not neutral anymore. Rahbany was never neutral!! Who convinced them by that? I mean he was always in the communis party and used to support el7arakael wataniyyeh. People mix here between his plays and this political opinions. When he does a play, he represent the reality in an artistic form. In a play u can not exclude anybody from criticism since it aims to be an artistic reflection. One thing his plays never deny presenting: his hatred to sectarianism.
As for addiyar, I hadn’t consider it a newspaper since found. Does it contain more than 4 pages of news?
And by the way, annahar is also biased in a way or another.
Tawwalit. Yalla off to home.
Saba7o ya Hillz! You know, every time I click Joseph Smeha’s page one question keeps popping into my head: would I qualify? Am I good enough to read his entire article without hiccups? You know, not all of us are A+++++++ students. It’s like a choosing to take a quiz. Now don’t misunderstand me, I love quizzes and I enjoy reading him but he tantalizes my ego, and that qualifies him for the title of “mfazlak” coz “mfazlak” is derived from the excess use of “fazalik”.
ReplyDeleteNow back to Al Akhbar, I always read them in their context, and I respect them, (not that I agree, I merely respect); however, for the past one week, and maybe before coz I stopped reading newspapers when I was on vacation (what a feeling!), they recently joined the circus. Now after reading the entire news for a couple of time, I grasped what the headline is referring to, but listen to this:
الثأر
أسياد
قتلى
أجهز
فتنة
All these terms are in the passive tense and in the first couple of lines. Let go the content, this is against ABC journalism, and qualifies for A2*B6/xy54 racine carre hater. I’m not a journalist, but I know for sure that the headlines need to be simple, straight to the point and informative. And this is not a debate about being biased or subjective or what so ever. No, this is about delivering the new is a professional way. It is a fact that people do not have the time to read all the news in the morning, they mostly read headlines. Now I don’t mind watching the circus and laughing or crying, but that would be in the evening, at home with my friend Jack Daniel! In the morning, when the boss is behind my back, starting my day with an extra dose of bloody words is not exactly what I call reading the news.
Regarding AD Diyar, you’re right they never made it as a newspaper, weren’t they the ones who translated the news about prince Andrew: “is Prince Andrew Gay??” to :
هل الأمير أندرو سعيد؟؟؟
Yes they are! And I’m a living example. That was long long time back, I actually read the news in Herald Tribune and a few days later I read the great translation in Ad Diyar. I always picked at their pathetic journalism skills but then I stopped, it’s a waist of time.
Annahar is biased, sure, but Annahar an Al Akhbar were my 2 quick source of information in the morning, I later indulge in reading Al Mustaqbal and Wa3ad and try to analyse….
mahdoumeh kteer achinar..
ReplyDeleteiza l 3alam bi libnen bitaffeh kil el TVs w byo7daro "dajadej judy", kinna sorna bi alf kheir :)
ReplyDelete